|
|
Virtual vs.
tangible sound |
|
|
Natural vs.
mechanical sound |
|
|
The sound from musical instruments can be enjoyable because of
the harmonic overtones they create. In order to reproduce all natural
colors and the musicality, a system has to preserve the harmonic
stuctures in the recording.
As soon as the keynote and it's overtones are shifted in time, it's
timbre/color is weakened, it sounds less rich and beautiful, less
natural, less tangible, the tones don't 'sing', the soul has gone.
You'll get that typical greyish, mechanic, 'hifi-ish' sound.
In an audio system harmonic coherency can be disturbed in many places.
Components behave different for different frequencies. All music
has to travel through each single component in the signal path,
one weak link in the chain spoils everything, so the signal path
needs to be as pure as possible.
Especially mathematical distortions like Jitter (timing-errors)
and digtal filtering disturb the delicate harmonic structures, which
explains the typical lack of richness and naturalness some people
experience in digital reproduction.
Most high-end designers try to achieve a clean sound, they remove
the 'dirty' textures, often unaware that they're destroying the
harmonic structures.
|
|
|
|
Adding character
vs. reproducing character |
|
|
Natural acoustic sounds have body, weight, lots of texture but
can sound transparant and airy at the same time. They can sound
warm, soft, rich but have immediacy, speed at the same time. They
can sound organic or even dirty but stay pure and pretty at the
same time. They can sound powerful, dynamic but stay relaxed and
delicate at the same time.
It are these combinations of qualities that are hard to achieve.
When designing equipment towards a certain character, another quality
is weakened. The only way to reproduce all these qualities is not
to add any character.
It's difficult to know/determine what's really neutral, so almost
without exception designers choose components that will create
the more resolution, tonal extension, transparancy, etc. at the
expense of other (initially less obvious) qualities.
(A 'neutral' system means that it doesn't add color, but this term
is often misused for equipment that's poor in reproducing
colors at all (flat/dull/'grey' sound). A truly neutral system would
be able to reproduce all natural colors of a recording.)
Manufacters/designers typically add 'musicality' to their
designs by warming-up/softening the sound (often trying to compensate
other problems). But true musicality, warmth, emotion, etc. all
have to come from the music/recording. Even if you like it sweet,
you don't want sugar on everything. A truly musical system doesn't
add, it only transfers all musicality from the recording.
|
|
|
|
Impressive
sound or enjoying music? |
|
|
The tendency in high-end audio has shifted towards spectacular
sound, which is understandible, it sells better too. But focussing
on superficial qualities will go at the expense of the deeper, initially
less obvious qualities.
Often equipment and speakers tend to 'strech' the extremes. Bright
and shiny highs (pulsed, exaggerated attack) have to create the
impression of more dynamics, transparency etc. A tight pounding
bass (overdamped) has to create the impression of more power, control
etc.
These exaggerations have bring some tonal diversity, unfortunately
the real diversity (from the recording) gets masked. When extremes
are 'streched', the sound is 'blown-up' and musical performance
gets 'teared apart' (harmonic relations are disturbed), coherency
is lost. The highs and basses don't seem to come from individual
instruments anymore, natural timbres suffer. Tangibility gets lost,
especially when transparency is faked.
Another disadvantage of 'streching' the extremes is that less perfect
recordings can sound worse than usual (or even unlistenable, aggressive).
|
|
|
|
Can your
system surprise you? |
|
|
Are you the
weakest link? |
|
|